Frick and Frack

It’s Rosh Hashanah, everybody! I’m with my family today, enjoying the day and their company. I’m also–as usual–watching the news. FOX News in particular. (Liberals, roll your eyes now and start the familiar “FOX isn’t news” mantra…face it, they’re getting John Stossel, they’ve already gotten Bernie Goldberg and Chris Wallace, you can’t just say they’re making up their own news or get pissed about their “right-wing agenda”.)

I just finished watching Chris Wallace’s Fox News Sunday section featuring ACORN CEO Bertha Lewis and Republican congressman Darrell Issa (don’t tell me they’re biased–you’d never see Issa or any other known conservative sitting next to such a die-hard liberal on any of the other major networks!). Wallace was fair; he actually gave much of the floor to Lewis. I found it very interesting, both amusing and at the same time irritating, that Lewis was completely incapable of addressing Issa. Not once did she so much as look at him. She didn’t turn to face him. She couldn’t even speak to the man–any time Issa posed a civil and rational question to Lewis, using “you” and “your” and other direct, personal words and phrases, Lewis would ONLY speak to Wallace. “What Mr. Issa says is interesting,” she’d say, or, “I’m glad Mr. Issa asked that question.” She wouldn’t even acknowledge he was in the same building, let alone sitting not two feet from her.

I daresay that behavior was absolutely outrageous. Can you imagine if Darrell Issa had done that? He’d have been tarred and feathered. It’s every bit as outrageous as Obama making a point to blitz all of the Sunday morning news shows…with the only exception being FOX. He wouldn’t give one second of airtime to FOX, yet he’d talk to every other big-name network.

This week, Andrew Breitbart’s http://www.biggovernment.com began running a series of explosive videos in which two independent journalists posing as pimp and prostitute ran a sting and caught at every single office ACORN employees giving them advice on evading detection for their illicit activities by finding ways to hoodwink the IRS and others who might come sniffing. In some cases, the ACORN workers gave tips on how to hide the fact that they were using underage girls from South America in a prostitution ring. When the videos first came out ACORN threatened to sue and put pressure on the Maryland AG’s office. That AG first tried to threaten Breitbart and his reporters with an investigation into supposed illegal wiretapping for recording the sessions. Today, after threatening FOX with a lawsuit for showing the videos, Lewis appeared with Wallace in a concerted damage control effort. Obama, though, is trying to claim he didn’t know what was going on and that he doesn’t care.

I think Obama would rather have dental surgery without anesthesia than talk to a FOX reporter. He’d rather talk to the reporters who fawned over him when he walked by because they won’t challenge him–they’ll ask him what appears to be a tough question, much like George Stephanopoulos did this morning on ABC, then once he’s given his answer they let it go. They won’t ask him to elaborate, they just move on. What happened to really asking the tough questions? I seriously think everyone in the MSM has lost their balls. I think they dropped off and rolled down their pant legs, and they didn’t stop to think before kicking them away as little more than an annoyance.

Stephanopoulos asked Obama about ACORN, to which Obama stuttered and finally said that he wasn’t paying attention to the ACORN controversy and the news about Congress cutting off funding to the community-organizing group. It stopped there, though. It went no further. Stephanopoulos allowed Obama to deny being involved and didn’t point out a single shred of evidence (of which there is quite a bit) that Obama is, in fact, heavily involved with ACORN. He always has been. Where were the challenges about Obama’s previous legal work on ACORN’s behalf? Where were the challenges about Obama training ACORN workers for Project Vote? Where were the questions about Obama giving more than $830,000 to Citizens Services, Inc., an ACORN front organization, for “advance work” on his campaign–work such as sound, lighting, lodging, polling and license fees. Mind you, ACORN and CSI are both supposedly just community organizing groups that canvas for low-income families. And the Obama campaign had to later revise their federal reports on the payments to CSI. They lied about it on the report they initially filed.

Nobody in the MSM has dared to cross The One and ask questions about funding, ties to ACORN, or questionable practices. Hardball my Texan ass–the MSM doesn’t know how to do it anymore. They couldn’t even play real hardball with Sarah Palin! What the hell kind of question is “what magazines do you read to get your news?” Are you freakin’ serious?

We need to face facts. Bertha Lewis and ACORN are a criminal racket and Obama is up to his eyeballs with them. He says he’s not paying much attention, but the reality is that he’s just trying to distance himself from his most ardent supporters in an attempt to save face. Plausible deniability is the new chic with Democrats. First Charles Gibson pretended to know nothing about the ACORN scandal, then Nancy Pelosi followed suit. Today, Obama played dumb. Obama and ACORN are frick and frack, folks. You can’t separate ’em.

Advertisements

14 thoughts on “Frick and Frack

  1. Have any of you been watching PBS on Saturday night? Last Saturday they screened the film Malcom X and the week before it was Six Degrees of Separation. Malcom X was a charlatan who died of firearm induced lead poisoning. The Will Smith character in Six Degrees is a charming charasmatic con artist who (won’t spoil it by telling what happens to him) in case you haven’t seen it. I wonder if PBS is taking a stab at Obama by screening these films on consecutive weeks?

  2. I love Fox News. And Obama’s snub was hysterical. He’s a child in some ways. Hell, he almost got mad at Stephanopolous, one of the most liberal fellows in news today.

    😀

  3. “That’s because even Stephanopoulos isn’t liberal enough for Obama’s taste.”

    I don’t think Lenin, Stalin, and Mao Tse Tung are liberal enough for Obama’s taste.

  4. “Ah, John…if you and I were both straight, I’d marry you.”

    You bet darling! Any woman who likes Jars of Clay is a sure fire keeper.

  5. “I think Obama would rather have dental surgery without anesthesia than talk to a FOX reporter”

    Can you blame him? FOX’s tactics are to first harass, then spin whatever words they can get someone to utter into something unrecognizable to what they actually said. Just look at the near conniption they had at the mere prospect of President Obama sitting “just a few feet away from” Qaddafi…

    “Stephanopoulos allowed Obama to deny being involved and didn’t point out a single shred of evidence (of which there is quite a bit) that Obama is, in fact, heavily involved with ACORN.”

    If I could get you to provide this so called evidence, that would make my day. The fact of the matter is, Obama, along with several lawyers, served as counsel for ACORN in a lawsuit regarding voting rights way back in 1995, a lawsuit, by the way, that enjoyed assistance from the Justice Department. To say that Obama is somehow overlord of ACORN is absolutely laughable. I find it stunningly hypocritical that those making these flimsy allegations are the same people that threw a fit when anyone brought up the ties that former Vice President Cheney had with his actual former company, Halliburton, and the fact that they received numerous no bid contracts from the government in spite of huge conflicts of interest arising from the fact that he still had millions of dollars of stock in said company; stock that went up over 400% after the decider decided that Iraq could use an injection of good old fashioned democracy. Oh, but ACORN registered Daffy Duck and gave shitty advice to a phony prostitute? Well, blame Obama, why don’t you? What a joke…

  6. And what is it that liberals say about people who refuse to appear on any network that isn’t FOX? You do realize that a large majority of the country feels that the rest of the MSM is what you described, right?

    “To say that Obama is somehow overlord of ACORN is absolutely laughable.”

    You’re right, it is laughable, especially since I didn’t say that. He’s heavily involved. He did a whole lot more than just give legal advice–he helped train their people, he paid them hundreds of thousands of dollars for work on his campaign, and he cannot distance himself from them.

    “Oh, but ACORN registered Daffy Duck and gave shitty advice to a phony prostitute? Well, blame Obama, why don’t you? What a joke…”

    Again, you’re putting words in our mouths. What was it you were saying about FOX?

  7. “You do realize that a large majority of the country feels that the rest of the MSM is what you described, right?”

    You’re going to have to define majority, because when one network stands alone in doing it, it’s not that everyone else is crazy, it’s you (the figurative you, not the actual you, being Mel)…

    “You’re right, it is laughable, especially since I didn’t say that. He’s heavily involved”

    I didn’t say that you specifically said that, but lots of cons think that, and you saying he’s heavily involved when he isn’t is practically conflating the two anyway.

    “Again, you’re putting words in our mouths. What was it you were saying about FOX?”

    You have got to be kidding me. I merely drew an inference based on the accusations you have thrown out. I don’t need to be a rocket surgeon to put two and two together. You most certainly implied that Obama is somehow culpable in ACORN’s recent troubles, when in fact, the extent of their relationship involves the aforementioned lawsuit and Obama hiring a subsidiary in a get out the vote effort in last year’s primary.

    And I don’t need to put words in anyone’s mouths. I’m sure you’ve seen the signs that are being waved around at protests. You can’t go to one without seeing a sign drawing an imaginary connection between Obama and ACORN.

  8. “You’re going to have to define majority, because when one network stands alone in doing it, it’s not that everyone else is crazy, it’s you”

    Read Bernard Goldberg’s writings. The man is a classic liberal and even HE says that there’s a palpable liberal bias throughout the established mainstream media. He gives specific incidents in both of his first books. He’s not the only one who tries to blow the whistle, either. David Horowitz has done the same.

    “And I don’t need to put words in anyone’s mouths. I’m sure you’ve seen the signs that are being waved around at protests. You can’t go to one without seeing a sign drawing an imaginary connection between Obama and ACORN.”

    Imaginary? That’s a hoot.

  9. “Read Bernard Goldberg’s writings”

    No thanks, I might end up shooting someone he tells me I should dislike.

    “Imaginary? That’s a hoot.”

    I’m still waiting for that “evidence”…

  10. “Quite the pathetic excuse for refusing to actually hear an opposing viewpoint and give it half a chance. And a sophomoric joke at best”

    Tough crowd. I’ve heard all I need to by watching the man’s appearances on FOX News. I have no interest in wasting American currency to see his same sentiments (albeit inanimate) in the pages of a book.

    “You want evidence? From Barack’s own website:”

    Yes, we’ve already established that ACORN supported Obama’s presidential bid, and that they have championed some of the same issues. Sadly, this does not make for heavy involvement in ACORN’s current woes…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s