The Inhumanity

Yesterday, the oldest death row inmate in the United States died of natural causes. He was 94 years old.

Born in 1915, Viva Leroy Nash was first arrested at the age of 15 in 1930 after an armed robbery and was sent to a federal prison in Leavenworth, KS. After that, he ended up in Connecticut where he shot a police officer (the officer survived) and was arrested a short time later in Dallas, Texas. He served 25 years in prison for that shooting. After that, he landed back in Salt Lake City – where he’d grown up – and he pulled off another armed robbery and murder in 1977. He was sentenced to two consecutive life sentences.

Somehow, this honest-to-God winner got assigned to an offsite work crew and in October 1982, he escaped. He ran for three weeks before robbing a coin shop in Phoenix. During the robbery, he shot employee Greggory West. A neighboring shop owner held Nash at gunpoint until police arrived and arrested him. Nash was then sentenced to death in the State of Arizona.

1982 was 28 years ago. 28 YEARS. At the time of his death his lawyers spoke fondly of him and talked about his deafness, near-blindness and wavering dementia. They spoke as if it had been a travesty that Nash had died in prison the way he did. As if society was wrong for not letting him go.

The real travesty is that it took 28 years for a death row inmate to die.

Those who are opposed to the death penalty, think about this: Nash, from the time he was 15 years old, did nothing but hurt people. Armed robbery, assault, murder, all of it caused nothing but pain. If he didn’t know it was wrong he wouldn’t have tried to run from the authorities when he committed the crimes. He knew what he was doing was wrong and he knew there would be a high price if he got caught. He learned early on how to play the system.

By the time he was caught in Utah in 1977, everyone should have known he would be a threat as long as he was alive. Thanks to the Supreme Court’s moratorium on executions, he was given two life sentences. Rather than sending him to a maximum-security facility, though, they gave him assignment to a work crew and he escaped to kill another day. For all we know, he may have committed more crimes that we didn’t finger him for.

It was a shame that he was allowed to founder in prison for 28 years. It was a shame that he was blind, deaf and approaching dementia. It’s a shame because he shouldn’t have been allowed to live as long as he did.

The arguments about those freed from death row by DNA evidence hold little water. There have been an extremely low number of those (I think a total of three) and most others released from death row have not actually been released from prison. Most have had their death sentences commuted to life sentences for one reason or another (one was commuted because the offender was 17 at the time that he murdered a nurse in Arizona and stole her truck and lived in her home after the crime and bragged to his friends about it, supposedly he was “too young” to understand what he’d done). Others have been granted pardons, but those are few and far between, too.

Nowadays when a person is accused of a crime, it’s because there is pretty damning evidence that the accused actually committed the crime. Our justice system is badly broken and needs to be fixed. If a person convicted of murder is sentenced to death, no more appeals for two decades–set aside one court to hear all death penalty appeals and give each convicted offender a maximum of one year. If the appeal is heard and denied before then, the death warrant should be signed and within 24 hours the death sentence should be carried out. It should be automatic.

I have no more tolerance whatsoever for liberals who think that the death penalty is wrong. Tell that to Bryan Wayne Hulsey, who murdered my friend Tony while he was on duty as a Glendale Police officer in 2007. He had only been out of prison for three months before he did that, and Tony wasn’t the first cop he’d attacked, and Tony’s family still waits and hopes for justice. Tell Deb Shuhandler and her two daughters; they just laid Eric, a 16-year-veteran of the Gilbert police department to rest after he was killed by another lifetime thug. Tell the children of Josie Greathouse Fox that the death penalty is wrong; their mother was a sheriff’s deputy in Millard County, Utah and was shot to death by an illegal alien drug offender.

Tell the walking wounded all over this nation who have survived losing a piece of themselves to murder that the death penalty is wrong. Tell them that it’s inhumane to take the life of the flab of human debris that killed their loved ones. We are all tired of hearing about how those people have rights. We had rights, too. As far as I can tell we still do. Don’t we have a say?

Advertisements

10 thoughts on “The Inhumanity

  1. You make a strong point, but a recently executed man in Texas had a strong chance of being innocent, and a Georgia man was almost executed after a ridiculously botched trail.

    And the amount of innocent people released from death row numbers in the hundreds, not “three”.

    It boils down to this: Is it ok to kill any number of murders if it would kill innocent people too/

    I think not.

  2. Tom, I understand your point, but I agree whole-heartedly with Mel on this. I think the best way to prevent unintentionally murdering innocents on Death Row is to make the death penalty the sole option for all felons convicted of a second violent crime. Don’t give the punishment to men convicted just once; it has to be twice. It seems impossible for an innocent man to be falsely tried and convicted twice in a row.

  3. Amy Bishop, killed her brother with a shotgun, investigated for a pipe bomb sent to her Harvard teacher and colleague, never had any follow up on those two investigations.

    Amy Bishop, gunned down three of her colleagues in the UAH biology department, who died, while another three she gunned down, are on life support and we hope they recover.

    If only her mother had not tried to protect her while her son was bleeding out after being shot by Amy….history might have been different.

    Sure Amy’s kids could have been born…after she had a few years to realize that murder was not the best answer to an argument that you are losing.

  4. I oppose the Death Penalty because it is far too arbitrary. But unlike the liberal element of society, I am fine with people being locked up for the rest of their lives with zero chance of parole.

    There are people who do horrible things that can never ever be redeemed. No amount of being a model prisioner and absolute contrition can make up for what was done.

    The battle here is not over the Death Penalty. The real battle is over life in prison without parole. But, before that battle is engaged, the Death Penalty needs to go away.

  5. Mel, I got an email from Amy Siskind who is in charge of the organization. She never heard from you. Did our emails get lost in the spam folder again?

  6. That’s alright. Remember to email it to Amy Siskind and not me. I guess her email addy is in your spammy as well. I look forward to reading what you have to say! ^_^ I love your posts.

  7. I would see no need for the death penalty if life in prison were at hard labor.

    I’m tired of hearing how awful prison conditions are. For lower level crimes like small time drug possession, I’ll agree that conditions are horrible and often exacerbate the problem.

    For murders, rapists, and child molesters I can’t see any conditions being too horrible.

    Work road crews, create rubble, split firewood, whatever. But work. HARD. No TV ever again. Spartan conditions. No care packages. Then I’ll have no complaints about death penalty enforcement.

    After all, the person they murdered never gets TV or care packages again either.

  8. It’s a situation where not all people will be happy. Life in prison for all hardened criminals in a country where liberals want terrorists residing is not practical. Sooner or later we run out of room. Then what? Ship the overflow to guantanamo?

  9. Well, well and you call yourself an individualist? No individualist would accuse whole population of islamist because of some minority. Don’t judge groups of people. Judge individuals. Thats how stereotypes are born. Thats how politicians start wars.

    BTW I’m agnostic 😉

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s