Spiegel Online International posted an interview with Left-Wing icon Daniel Ellsberg. Spiegel asked Ellsberg:
“You were the ultimate whistleblower. In 1971, you leaked the Pentagon Papers to the New York Times, revealing that the government was well aware the Vietnam War couldn’t be won. You changed history but were vilified and prosecuted for it. Would you still do it today.”
Ellsberg’s response was:
“I wouldn’t wait that long. I would get a scanner and put them on the Internet.”
The Vietnam War was not won because the Left sabotaged it; just like they are doing now in regards to the War on Terror. And let’s not forget: members of both parties said this was a conflict about which we needed to remain vigilant. Members of both parties voted for it.
Just for the record, what Daniel Ellsberg did is called…treason. This is a word I would like to bring back with the full force of it’s meaning. This notion the Left has put forward that there is no such thing as treason to one’s country is just like everything else they put forward: muddled, unethical, unprincipled, civilization detroying, clap-trap. It is the constant drum-beat that there is no such thing as right and wrong. Yes, there is such a thing as right and wrong. I can personally testify to that reality. I’ve studied enough philosophy to know that right and wrong do indeed exist as verifiable, objective concepts. If right and wrong didn’t exist we would live in anarchy and would be killing each other in the streets. Pretty simple.
“The Constitution of the United States, Art. III, defines treason against the United States to consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid or comfort. This offence is punished with death. By the same article of the Constitution, no person shall be convicted of treason, unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open court.”
The act of speaking out against war is the very essence of free speech. In today’s media outlet, however, where words are broadcast instantly across the globe, you are, as far as I’m concerned, “giving aid and comfort to the enemy”.
The world is perishing not only from “an orgy self-sacrifice” as Ayn Rand would say in regards to economics–but also of intellectual retardation put forth by the inability to think critically. We have the liberal-elite controlled schools to thank for that little gift where there is no such thing as an “F”. I digress.
In addition to a clarification on the definition of the word “treason” we also need to discuss the difference between self-defense and murder. This is how the Left gets away with muddying up the concepts. The Left has promoted the idea that self-defense and murder are the same thing. They are not.
As an Objectivist I hate using religion to defend political positions. When the Left, however, uses religion to defend their positions then you need to defeat them with their own words. From Bible-Study.org:
“According to the Bible not all killing is murder.”
You can read the rest of the link for more religious clarification.
As an Objectivist, I simply say it is the intent that matters. If you are defending yourself you are justified. If you are murdering, in other words committing the act for the sake of committing the act or to prevent yourself from being discovered in the act of some other immoral act you have performed such as breaking and entering where the homeowner has arrived home, you are not justified. It is the intent behind the act that determines whether it is justifiable or not.
How long will we wait to declare war? The extremists have declared it on us numerous times. They’ve made their intentions clear about wanting to make Westerners submit to their religion. Their grievance is not just about “leaving their land” as Ron Paul seems to believe. And will waiting produce a horror even more vivid than 9/11? Perhaps we will wait until a dirty bomb goes off in one of our cities to find out? Hey…why not? We have Somali terrorists crossing our southern border disguised as Mexicans. If I’m not mistaken one of the things we supposedly “learned” from 9/11 was the degree to which the terrorists who flew planes into our buildings were here illegally? I’m bi-partisanly pissed off in regards to this issue because the Republicans were no better at enforcing border security when they had the chance. In fact, McCain tried to push for amnesty for illegals. There is nothing like a little intellectual inconsistency to make the world…not go ’round.
The politician says, “We have terrorists who mean to do harm and we should fight them…, but, hey…let’s leave the borders in complete chaos!”
Give me a break.
It is even worse now with a party in power, who for all intents and purposes, believe there should be no borders because we’re all one big happy global family! That…and the fact that since Americans typically reject Leftism they need the votes of people who do not understand our culture and constitution to keep putting them in power.
If I had members of my family who were as violently disfunctional as the socialist, communist, fascistic and theocratic countries which are still in existence–I’d be looking for legal separation with restraining orders attached.
Treason. Yes–it’s still a viable concept.