Common Sense Conservatism: Health Care Reform

“How can health care for everyone be a bad thing?”

Several months ago, one of my friends uttered this quote in an attempt to combat the negative press surrounding President Obama’s health care bill as it was being considered by Congress. The answer to that question, of course, is that health care for everyone is not a bad thing, it is a great thing. Sadly my friend missed the point, and so did many Americans: How do you pay for it when we’re $13 trillion in debt? Health Care Reform gripped the nation as yet another non-partisan issue was politicized for the sole purpose of damaging political opponents. In the end there was no winner; only losers: The American People.

Every issue has an upside and a downside. In 1986, the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act required hospital emergency rooms to treat anyone in need of care, regardless of citizenship, legal status, or ability to pay. The upside was that patients were not turned away from needed health care. The downside is that “about half of all emergency services go uncompensated.” The best intentions of government resulted in a huge unfunded mandate to emergency departments nationwide and a loss of $4.2 billion in revenue in 2001 according to the American Medical Association. Nobody wants to see patients denied much-needed care, but how can the government pass laws that help some people and completely destroy others?

Health care reform divided the nation along lines defined by views of big government versus small, and compassion versus fiscal responsibility. At a time when the economy was the top concern for Americans, not health care, Congress unveiled a $940 billion bill which was passed into law on March 23, 2010. Republicans were once again labeled “obstructionists,” even though they didn’t have enough votes to stop the Democrats from passing the bill. Democrats called Republicans the usual names, accusing them of being racists, hating the poor and defending the rich.

Today, 60% of Americans favor repeal.

It seems as if every issue where Democrats and Republicans disagree ends with more Americans believing that the GOP is racist, anti-poor and pro-rich. Why are Democrats so good at convincing Americans of these stereotypes? I believe it is because Democrats tend to politicize with emotional buzzwords and headlines, while Republicans do it with logic. So, are Republicans heartless to oppose a bill that would extend health care benefits to 32 million Americans? Well, let’s consider some of the objections.

The government is notoriously inefficient. In a previous post I went over the resume of the U.S. Government in detail, including the tremendous successes (read: failures) of Amtrak, Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, the U.S. Postal Service, the Ryan White CARE Act, and Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac. Even recipients of government funding like Planned Parenthood operate without oversight, as they apparently can’t account for $1.8 billion in taxpayer dollars received over the last decade. This isn’t a partisan problem. The government is inefficient under EVERY administration, which is why a majority of Americans prefer a smaller government. As it is, the bill is already estimated to cost $115 billion more than anticipated, and it hasn’t yet gone into effect.

It is simply a bad law. The health care law is designed to increase access to health care and lower costs so more Americans can afford to purchase health insurance. Correct? Does taxing the manufacturers of medical devices and brand-name prescription drugs help lower the cost of health care? Those increased costs will undoubtedly be passed on to the consumer, who is now forced to carry health insurance because of the mandates in the health care law – no matter what the cost! In fact, nothing in the new law controls the rising costs of health care. It does, however, force businesses to file a 1099 form for every vendor transaction of $600 or more, which creates a pile of paperwork for even the smallest businesses. What purpose does this serve in a health care bill? None! It has nothing to do with health care.

Going forward, individuals will no longer be able to claim medical expenses on their taxes that exceed 7.5% of their income. The new number is 10%, resulting in roughly $800 less in deductions for someone earning $25,000/year. President Obama said those earning under $250k/year wouldn’t see their taxes increase by a “single dime,” but if you can’t claim an additional $800 in medical expenses on your tax return, I think you’re out more than a dime. Medicare payroll taxes are also going up 2.35% for those earning more than $200k, and revenue from the increase in Medicare taxes will not be going to help save or fix Medicare. Medicare, in fact, is being cut by $500,000,000,000.00!

Then there are the mandates. Individuals will now be required to carry health insurance, whether they can afford it or not. Your coverage must also meet minimum government standards to “qualify” as an acceptable health care plan. The penalty for not complying will be as much as $750 per year for an individual, $2,250 for a family, or 2% of your income – whichever is higher. The employer mandates could cause some series damage. Employers who cannot afford to offer health insurance to their employees will pay fines, which could amount to $3,000 per employee, per year. This will unquestionably cause jobs to be cut and businesses to close. That’s a fact that cannot be ignored.

Of course we can’t forget luxury health care plans, called “Cadillac Plans.” These are plans that cost more than $8,500 per year for an individual. They’re great plans, but there will now be a 40% excise tax on them. Yes, that’s right – 40%. It is designed to go after the rich, but it is not indexed for inflation, which means in 10 years when all plans cost $8,500/year or more, everyone will be paying the 40% tax. Many union-negotiated plans are considered “Cadillac Plans,” but if you’re in a union you don’t have to worry about it. President Obama exempted unions from this 40% tax. For the record, only 8% of Americans are in unions.

The new law also allows the Department of Health and Human Services to create “qualified non-profit health insurance issuers” to offer health insurance, with federal grants, and exempt from federal taxes. It requires health care coverage information to be reported to the IRS, and provides funding to hire 16,000 additional IRS agents to ensure compliance with the individual and employer mandates.

What’s not in the bill? Tort reform for starters. We live in a lawsuit-happy society, and doctors must carry expensive insurance policies to protect themselves from frivolous lawsuits and mega-million dollar settlements. Those costs get passed on to patients, contributing to the high costs of health care. Republicans wanted tort reform included. Democrats argued it would not result in a significant savings, however it should be noted that trial lawyers donate almost exclusively to the Democratic Party. Another provision not included in the bill was the ability to purchase health care plans across state lines. This would increase competition and help lower costs, as we’ve seen happen in the auto insurance industry. Again, Democrats refused to include it after it was proposed by Republicans.

The House of Representatives requires 218 votes to pass a bill into law, and when the health care law was passed 253 were Democrats. The Senate requires 51 votes to pass a bill into law, and when the health care law was passed 57 were Democrats. Once again, I need someone to tell me how Republicans were being “obstructionists.” In reality, Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi didn’t get to pass the law they wanted because conservative Democrats were pressured to oppose the bill. That’s why the far-left liberals today feel as though the law doesn’t go far enough. Republicans, who opposed the bill almost unanimously through the entire process, didn’t even have to show up for the final votes.

In the end, not a single Republican in the House or Senate voted to pass what is now referred to as ObamaCare. After the Senate passed the health care law, the San Francisco Chronicle stated, “The passage of Health Care Reform means the death of the Republican Party. Can you imagine any Republican effectively explaining to an electorate why they voted against help for the uninsured?” Help for the uninsured, at the expense of the remaining 90% of Americans? This issue is not as black and white as the Chronicle would have us believe.

Nine months later, a clear majority of Americans favor repeal and Democrats face the possibility of losing the House of Representatives. When you politicize a non-political issue like health care, emotions get in the way and eventually you have to start looking at the facts. Almost everyone agrees that our health care system is in need of reform, but if Congress is going to spend years and trillions of taxpayer dollars reforming it, shouldn’t we do it right? “It’s better than nothing,” is simply not good enough.

The simple truth is that President Obama and Democrats in Washington thought health care reform would be their golden moment, ensuring victories in 2010 and 2012. They completely underestimated the political cost of going against the majority of Americans, and I’m happy to see our nation waking up and paying attention to important issues again.

Someday we may even see Americans paying attention to the details of those issues. I welcome it.


10 thoughts on “Common Sense Conservatism: Health Care Reform

  1. This is what troubles me about this “reform.”

    Hospitals are a business where supply creates demand. Only nutty people intentionally injure themseleves or make themselves sick. Nobody wants to go to a hospital. Nobody wants to go to a doctor. You go when you need to if that.

    A hospital needs to fill beds to cover the costs of running a hospital. Empty beds don’t bring in revenue. Empty rooms have to be cleaned and maintained too. An expensive MRI machine that sits there without being used is a drain on a hospital. Doctors need patients to generate bills.

    So what stops a hospital and doctors from parking their to pig aout? There is one thing. That thing is Insurance.

    People without insurance are a money drain to any hospital. So, get them out quickly and pray they never return.

    People with Insurance are not a total blessing. Insurance companies deny care and be glad they do. No insurance company would last if it said Yes to every operation, consultation, treatment, test and drug therapy. Denial is what keeps the insurance industry from imploding. People may not like denial of care from an insurance company. But they accept that is part of the process.

    Now enter Uncle Sam. Are people ready for Uncle Sam to say No to certain medical things? I am not talking about death panels. What I am talking about is an annual budget and care allocated based on that budget. Every nation with national health insurance has this system. A healthcare budget keeps these nations from going bankrupt. And yes, people are told No in these nations and for good reason.

    I don’t see Americans as willing to accept No from their government. That on its own makes health care for all a very bad idea. We can’t afford a health care system of Yes for everyone. No nation can. No nation does. Even without 13 trillion in debt we can’t afford this.

  2. I’m excited to be finally posting online after all these years. There really is no mystery about it, is there? I just dropped by your blog and had to write something. I’m a recent college grad, journalism major if you must know, and I absolutely love the art of photography. I’ve got my site up but it’s nothing to boast about yet. None of my stuff’s been posted. Soon as I figure out how to do that, I’ll spend the day posting my best pictures. anyhow just thought I’d drop a line. I hope to return with more substantial stuff, stuff you can actually use. SPG

  3. I really, really have strong feelings about this. For one, if I had my preference, our family would only carry a catastrophic medical plan – i.e., a plan that only kicks in if we end up at the hospital for some reason or another (and not for routine medical care).

    The reason for this is that we have been blessedly healthy. So healthy, that we have NEVER passed the gap on our coverage where the insurance will actually kick in and start paying for things. We would be much better off if we had been socking away the money we pay each month for premiums and then paying the much smaller catastrophe amount. Over the summer, I had a heart issue scare which required multiple tests – we paid (although the lower network price) for all of them. In addition to our monthly bill.

    I HATE it. And there’s no other options for us with the new laws.

    (as an aside – we also paid out of pocket for pregnancy/labor and delivery as we used home-birth midwives for the last three of our children. It was less than a quarter of the cost of a hospital birth. It’s not for everyone, but you would think it would be an option on the healthcare form for more people…)

  4. AFW – You and your family have been very lucky and I hope your good luck continues (I would guess you are smart and take care of yourselves too to minimize health complications). I worked for a cleaning company and only had catastrophic. Subsequently I almost never went to the doctor and when I had to take medication begged samples off of them (they understood my situation and gave me bunches of samples when they could). Later I got another fulltime job where I am no (a church) with decent insurance so I felt I could afford to go to the doctors when I would normally have tried to “suck it up.” Like losing 20lbs in 2 weeks after months of (what I would later realize were) symptoms of diabetes. Looking back I had had the symptoms for years. So insurance was a Godsend and still is. BUT…..I have the insurance by getting a better job and paying for it and I still try not to abuse it. I also try to be smart and take care of myself. I don’t see a lot of people being able to or even trying to do that.
    Oh, one of the things they talked about taxing (not sure if they will do it) is insulin pumps which I have used for about 5+ years of my 12 years of diagnosed Type 1 diabetes! That will make it more expensive and more difficult for many people to control it and lead to more health complications up the road (blindness, limb loss, etc). I used to joke the insurance company would figure out what medication worked for me and tell me I couldn’t use it to shorten my life and save them money. I KNOW Uncle Sam will do that and the only people who’ll come out ahead are the ones who already know how to game the system.
    Also, I run out of breath reminding all the Bush haters that the Dems were in control the last two years (under Bush) and they have been in control since Obama arrived and STILL blame the Republicans when things don’t get done the way they are “supposed to!”
    AndyB, NH (ranting away).

  5. Andy – I think your comment about how you still try not to abuse your insurance is an important one. I know too many people who run to the emergency room at the drop of a hat, when they are showing symptoms that don’t rise to the emergency level. It gluts the insurance companies, it gluts the hospitals, and it makes it harder to treat real emergencies.

    I wish more people would think the way you do – we’d be halfway to solving this “crisis” if that line of thought were more common.

    We’re healthy now, and I realize that can change at any time. However, if we were allowed to sock away the money we pay into insurance into a medical account, we’d still be ahead of the game. We’d have a LOT of money in there! And that would cover future problems that crop up.

    I’m not letting insurance companies off the hook – they’re nasty creatures in their own right. But the marketplace could go a long way towards taking care of that issue. We had TriCare insurance while AFG was active duty, and trying to get ANYTHING ok’d by them was horrific. I had a skin cancer mole that needed to be removed, and it took 6 months for them to ok a dermatology appointment (we didn’t have a dermatologist at our clinic). AND the dermatologist was nearly 2 hours away. Granted, the roads where we were stationed are ridiculous cow paths, but still. Dermatologists are like Wal Mart, at this point. They’re everywhere.

  6. “We would be much better off if we had been socking away the money we pay each month for premiums and then paying the much smaller catastrophe amount.”

    I have catastrophe insurance. I am glad I have it and I want to keep it. I hope I can keep it. But something tells me I’ll have to trade up even if I don’t want too.

    As for your family AFW, you and yours are the grain the wheel needs to grind. You are healthy folks who don’t make insurance claims. So am I. This health insurance reform plan is bearing down on us and I don’t like that.

  7. Needed to put you the tiny remark in order to say thanks a lot yet again considering the beautiful knowledge you have shared at this time. It\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’s simply surprisingly generous with people like you to provide without restraint exactly what a lot of people could have offered for sale for an ebook to end up making some profit on their own, most importantly given that you could possibly have done it if you decided. These advice as well worked like a fantastic way to fully grasp that other people have the identical dreams just like my very own to find out good deal more with reference to this condition. I am sure there are a lot more enjoyable occasions in the future for people who scan through your blog post.

  8. I needed to compose you the bit of word in order to say thanks over again on the striking concepts you\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’ve discussed in this case. This is certainly strangely open-handed of people like you to make publicly all most of us would have supplied for an ebook to help with making some dough on their own, even more so now that you might have done it if you ever desired. Those advice additionally worked as the fantastic way to recognize that some people have similar desire like mine to know more when it comes to this problem. I believe there are millions of more pleasant sessions ahead for individuals who looked over your site.

  9. Needed to put you one tiny remark to finally give thanks yet again regarding the pretty basics you have contributed on this website. This has been strangely generous of people like you to make freely what exactly numerous people could have sold as an electronic book to make some cash for their own end, precisely since you could possibly have done it in case you considered necessary. These points likewise acted to be a good way to be sure that other people have similar dreams just as my personal own to know the truth more and more in regard to this problem. I am certain there are a lot more pleasurable occasions in the future for those who find out your website.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s