What’s Wrong With This Picture?

“Don’t use words too big for the subject. Don’t say infinitely when you mean very; otherwise you’ll have no word left when you want to talk about something really infinite.” -C.S. Lewis

This picture was spotted on Facebook. It was linked by a liberal friend of mine who does agree with it. She also happens to be the only liberal I know who doesn’t openly hope that I’ll be shot in the face. We agree to disagree on politics, pretty much sticking to films and other such subjects.

Look carefully at this, and ponder the claims.

First, Gingrich. The very first claim made is the only honest one – yes, he has been married three times. I don’t like it. There’s a lot of conservatives who don’t like it. I’m not, however, willing to use it as a reason to push him out of politics because of it. The second claim is that he was indicted for scandal; this is either a bald-faced lie or an ignorant mistake. The whole scandal revolved around the improper usage of tax-exempt donations and using the chairman of GOPAC to help him develop the legislation that the GOP would support during his tenure as the Speaker of the House; the use of a consultant violated House rule 45 (which apparently bars the use of official resources for unofficial purposes, yet I cannot find a single document that lists what the rules were for the 104th Congress), as did apparently allowing a man named Donald Jones to use his Congressional office to work on a reading program for children that was supposed to tie in with the Speaker’s “Earning by Learning” program.

“Indicted” means just cause was found to bring charges before a court because a crime was committed. Gingrich was investigated but never indicted – nor was he ever impeached. In fact, 83 of the original 84 ethics complaints against him were dropped after an extensive four-year investigation because it was determined that none of the violations occurred while Gingrich was the Speaker of the House – which was when the violations were alleged to have taken place. The only complaint that remained was a claim that he had failed to abide by federal tax law in regards to donations. THAT was tossed as well when the IRS and a federal judge determined the law had not been broken (the original complaint stated that GOPAC had improperly funded his campaign and failed to publicize its list of donors). In the end, he was fined $300,000 to repay the cost of the investigation.

The third allegation is where the C.S. Lewis quote comes in. It simply says “racist/homophobic”. The only evidence anyone has ever provided that he’s a racist was his comment, made in 2008, that “Spanish is the language of living in the ghetto.” He was talking about the importance of teaching English in this country. Now, he almost immediately apologized for how it sounded, but not one of the people who claim he is a racist has acknowledged that fact. He clarified that what he was trying to say was that English is the language spoken in the United States and it is important to learn our language if you want to really succeed here. He is correct about that, and there’s nothing racist about it. Every other claim is that he’s used “coded racist speech” (translation: we want to call him a racist to shut him up but he won’t cooperate and use overt hate speech so we’ll read into his words whatever we want).

Homophobic? I don’t think so. He has said that he doesn’t believe genetics have to be followed, he believes homosexuality to be a choice, and he is against gay marriage, but I don’t consider that homophobic. A person who has an irrational fear of homosexuals is a homophobe, and not one person can claim that he has an irrational fear of us (see my previous post for genuine evidence of homophobia). It is ridiculous to claim that the man is a racist or a homophobe because there is no evidence of either – and when you do call him those things, when you come up against the real deal you no longer have a word to describe them.

Now, for the claims about the Big O!

Married once – yes, that’s true. Has he been faithful? We honestly don’t know. At least three separate claims of infidelity from both Barack AND Michelle have been made, but the press is sleeping on the job. They’re about as interested in investigating these claims as I am in having my wisdom teeth removed.

No scandals? I beg to differ. Fast & Furious leaps to mind – under Bush, it was known as Project Gunrunner and when they figured out it was going to be a failure they killed it. Obama resurrected it, gave it three times the original budget and four times the manpower, and it became a train wreck on steroids. Obama’s Attorney General, Eric Holder, has already lied in Congressional hearings about his knowledge of the program – and is now dodging subpoenas. At least one ATF official, Patrick Cunningham, has pleaded the Fifth (and has since resigned). There’s Carol Browner and Ken Salazar, who both helped draw up the completely illegal offshore drilling ban, complete with invented claims attributed to a Congressional panel that actually strongly objected to the ban. The administration was later called out by a Louisiana judge for continuing to enforce the illegal ban. There’s the administration’s loan to Solyndra, $535M to be exact. More recently, other “green” companies that received millions of taxpayer dollars – Evergreen Energy, Beacon Power Corp., and electric car manufacturer Ener1 – have gone belly-up, with several others teetering on the edge of bankruptcy.

There was the no-bid $433M contract awarded to Siga Technologies for an experimental smallpox drug that some experts say may not even work. There’s the ongoing issues with former NJ governor Jon Corzine, who quietly got his Obama campaign donations back although Obama hasn’t commented on Corzine’s role in the MF Global scandal (and Corzine wasn’t the only MF Global head who had supported Obama). The Obamacare waivers, however, are one of the biggest scandals of all – every single one went to DNC supporters, including labor unions, Nevada casinos and fancy restaurants in Pelosi’s district responsible for thousands in Obama campaign money (literally 20% of those waivers landed in Pelosi’s district).

Oh, but he ended DADT! That’s great, right? Well, I’d buy that if it weren’t for his continued support of DOMA, originally signed into law by Bill Clinton (sorry, lefties – claiming that he doesn’t because he’s telling the DOJ not to defend it in court isn’t enough, he does not support repeal at all). You’ll never see a photo like this containing Mitt Romney. He has no scandals in his personal life and he signed gay marriage rights into law when he was governor of Massachusetts. The gay left has no response to him, so they’re going to attack Newt.

And, really…Jeremiah Wright? Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn? Tony Rezko? ACORN?!? No scandal, my backside.


8 thoughts on “What’s Wrong With This Picture?

  1. Every liberal you’ve interacted with but this one friend has openly stated they want to shoot you in the face?! I don’t know the political landscape of Arizona much, but isn’t that, at least, say 30 or 40% of the population?

    Yes, I know that you get called “self loathing closet case”, but that’s not quite the same level as wishing you physical violence.

    To restate the CS Lewis quote in a rather cumbersome fashion:

    “Don’t use words too big for the subject. Don’t say ‘want to shoot me in the face’ when you mean ‘call me self loathing’; otherwise you’ll have no word left when you want to talk about someone really does want to shoot you in the face.”

  2. I didn’t say THEY want to shoot me in the face…I said they hoped it would happen. And yes, the ones I personally know have openly wished for that. The ones I actually know got pretty pissed off at me when I outed myself as a political conservative and refused to budge on my beliefs.

  3. Yeah, right. I call BS. Even in online posts I’ve seen, where people are hiding behind the safety of their computer screen, 95% of the posts stop at calling you (and fellow homocons) “self loathing”, “stupid”, told to STFU etc. Uncalled for and counter-productive, sure. On the same level as wishing your death, hardly. Why should I believe people really have the guts to say something to your face they wouldn’t say from a computer? Either that or you seriously need to move to a city or neighborhood with less violent psychotic people.

    For the record. Pissed off, insults, name calling, none of these equal hoping you get shot or wanting to shoot you.

    BTW as I’ve been learning more about the “gay conservative” phenomenon I’ve learned more about that nasty piece of work Chris Barron and the shit he has said about liberals and the “gay left”, calling them cockroaches, the American Taliban, dumb as shit. I sincerely would love for him to shut up and stop being such a liar but I do not wish anyone to commit physical violence against him. I guess politically I would be closer to the liberal side than the conservative side, and though we have never and will never meet personally…. there you go, now there are at least two liberals (or even your considerably more vile and high profile counterpart Chris Barron) who don’t want you shot in the face.

  4. Oops, the statement in parentheses in the last paragraph is in the wrong place, should go between the words “you” and “shot”.

  5. Again, Luke, I remind you that I AM TALKING ABOUT PEOPLE THAT i PERSONALLY KNOW.

    Those people don’t typically post comments here because they can yell at me in person. We have had ongoing feuds since I came out of the closet eight years ago. Please, don’t twist my words, and don’t put words in my mouth. It’s irritating.

  6. I hit the button too quickly…most of them don’t read this blog. I think that’s the chief reason why they don’t post comments. One of them, however – when I asked why he had to come find me in person to tell me that he actually wished I would end up lashed to a fence post so I would know what it’s like – said, “oh, right, like I’m stupid enough to put it in writing so you and your neocon friends can go on your little Fox News crusade!”

    When I asked him to elaborate, he waved me off and walked away.

  7. In response to the topic of the post.

    Debunking these little liberal picture memes is always fun and useful. I’m going to reblog this onto my blog if that’s alright?
    I’m not a fan of Gingrich, not because of infidelity, I could care less about that. I just don’t like his approach to “conservative” ideas. He doesn’t seem that conservative to me, but this is still a great job of breaking the lies down.

  8. I wholeheartedly agree with you on all ponits. I bought a lovely wrap and although I have yet to use it successfully, I know that is down to my lack of experience and having awake wriggly babies when I try to use it. Yes its frustrating not to be able to use it straight away and get those awesome shots, yes its frustrating when you try to use a wrap and you are fingers and thumbs and wondering if its big enough but I know its down to me and practice. If someone has an issue they should contact the seller privately and I’m sure they would give you advice. Its not fair to openly complain without practicing and without seeking advice on how to use it properly first.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s